# United States v. Samuel

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 22, 2015 · 627 F. App'x 213

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8678735

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Otis SAMUEL, Jr., a/k/a O
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 22, 2015
- **Citations:** 627 F. App'x 213
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Diaz, Hamilton, Harris
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8678735

## Opinion text

*214 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Otis Samuel, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying Samuel’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2014). We have reviewed the record and •find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Samuel, No. 4:13-cr-00321-RBH-1 (D.S.C. July 24, 2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8678735. Public record. Not legal advice.