# Brown v. South Carolina

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 20, 2015 · 589 F. App'x 190

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8676502

## Case

- **Full name:** Orlando Ira BROWN v. SOUTH CAROLINA, State of
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 20, 2015
- **Citations:** 589 F. App'x 190
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Davis, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8676502

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Brown appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his discrimination complaint against the State of South Carolina as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. South. Carolina, No. 3:13-cv-02983-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8676502. Public record. Not legal advice.