# Stine v. Doe

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 29, 2014 · 569 F. App'x 163

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8674640

## Case

- **Full name:** Mikeal STINE Jeremy Pinson, and Andrew Hobbs Jerry BROWN v. John DOE, Special Investigative Agent—FCC Butner Federal Bureau of Prisons
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 29, 2014
- **Citations:** 569 F. App'x 163
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8674640

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Mikeal Stine and Jeremy Pinson appeal the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g) (2012) their complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Stine v. Doe, No. 5:13-ct-03279-D, 2014 WL 229343 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8674640. Public record. Not legal advice.