# Singleton v. Nelson

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 22, 2014 · 568 F. App'x 197

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8674524

## Case

- **Full name:** Nathaniel SINGLETON v. Food Service Officer Mr. NELSON Food Service Mr. Taylor Food Service Mr. Craze Food Service Ms. Johnson Food Service Ms. Venton Administrative Food Service Brown Administrative Food Service Argline
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 22, 2014
- **Citations:** 568 F. App'x 197
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8674524

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Singleton seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss some, but not all, of Singleton’s claims asserted under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Singleton seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8674524. Public record. Not legal advice.