# Brown v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · April 9, 2007 · 227 F. App'x 614

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8609495

## Case

- **Full name:** Tyree W. BROWN, and Andrea Rose v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 9, 2007
- **Citations:** 227 F. App'x 614
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Bea, Graber, Scannlain
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8609495

## Opinion text

MEMORANDUM **
A review of the record, the opening brief, and the response to the court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8609495. Public record. Not legal advice.