# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 22, 2007 · 213 F. App'x 216

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8606526

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Rashawn Ali BROWN
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 22, 2007
- **Citations:** 213 F. App'x 216
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Gregory, Traxler, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8606526

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that sentencing courts should determine the sentence range under the guidelines, consider other statutory factors, and impose a reasonable sentence within the statutory maximum

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Rashawn Ali Brown appeals from his eighteen-month sentence imposed pursuant to his guilty plea to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. On appeal, he asserts that his sentence was unreasonable because “it is greater than necessary to comply with the purposes of sentencing.” We have carefully reviewed *217 the record and Brown’s contentions and find that the sentence imposed by the district court at the bottom of the guideline range was reasonable. See United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 546-47 (4th Cir. 2005) (noting that sentencing courts should determine the sentence range under the guidelines, consider other statutory factors, and impose a reasonable sentence within the statutory maximum). Accordingly, we affirm Brown’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8606526. Public record. Not legal advice.