# United States v. Michel-Garcia

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · September 14, 2006 · 201 F. App'x 476

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8604176

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. Jose Alberto MICHEL-GARCIA, aka Jesus Ramirez-Garcia, Defendant—Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 14, 2006
- **Citations:** 201 F. App'x 476
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Graber, Nelson, Pregerson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8604176

## Opinion text

MEMORANDUM **
Jose Alberto Michel-Garcia appeals from his 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
Michel-Garcia contends that the government produced insufficient evidence to demonstrate clearly and unequivocally that his prior conviction under California Health & Safety Code § 11352(a) qualified as a “drug trafficking offense” for the purpose of a sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A).
California Health and Safety Code § 11352 is over-inclusive under the categorical approach of Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 , 110 S.Ct. 2143 , 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). See United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc). Therefore, we must employ Taylor’s modified categorical approach to determine whether Michel-Garcia’s prior conviction qualifies as a predicate drug trafficking offense. See id.
Considered together, the charging document, abstract of judgment, and the change of plea form, which specifically noted that Michel-Garcia pled guilty and admitted that he “sold .08 grams of cocaine,” clearly and unequivocally established that he was convicted of a “drug trafficking offense,” for the purposes of an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). See Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 21-22, 26 , 125 S.Ct. 1254 , 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8604176. Public record. Not legal advice.