# Alan Lee Distributors, Inc. v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · September 20, 2006 · 199 F. App'x 952

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8603939

## Case

- **Full name:** ALAN LEE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. (doing business as ADI Pet, Inc.) and Christopher Weinberg, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. Van BROWN, Defendant-Petitioner
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- **Decided:** September 20, 2006
- **Citations:** 199 F. App'x 952
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Bryson
- **Judges:** Bryson, Clevenger, Lourie
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8603939

## Opinion text

ORDER
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Van Brown petitions for permission to appeal the Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on August 24, 2006. Alan Lee Distributors, Inc. et al. respond.
A petition for permission to appeal is filed when a district court certifies an order, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b), for interlocutory appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 5. In this case, the district court did not certify an order under that section. Instead, the district court has entered judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b). * Thus, Brown’s petition for permission to appeal is unnecessary.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The petition for permission to appeal is denied as unnecessary.
We note that Brown has appealed the Rule 54(b) judgment and that appeal has been docketed as 2006-1618.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8603939. Public record. Not legal advice.