# Stokes v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 24, 2006 · 191 F. App'x 177

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8602441

## Case

- **Full name:** Yolanda W. STOKES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, t/a Petersburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority Julian Marsh, Executive Director, Petersburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority Nathaniel Pride, Board of Commissioners of the Petersburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority (Past and Present) Sheryl Ford, Board of Commissioners of the Petersburg Redevelopement and Housing Authority (Past and Present) Ann Morgan, Board of Commissioners of the Petersburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority (Past and Present) Board of Commissioners of the Petersburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Defendants—Appellees, and Nancy Wesoff, former Executive Director, Petersburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 24, 2006
- **Citations:** 191 F. App'x 177
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hamilton, Widener, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8602441

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Yolanda W. Stokes appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Stokes’ employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stokes v. HUD, No. CA-05-239-3 (E.D.Va. Dec. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8602441. Public record. Not legal advice.