# Okello v. Gonzales

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 12, 2006 · 182 F. App'x 173

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8600857

## Case

- **Full name:** Caroline Adhiambo OKELLO v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 12, 2006
- **Citations:** 182 F. App'x 173
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Duncan, Gregory, Michael
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8600857

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated petitions for review, Caroline Adhiambo Okello, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of two separate orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”): (1) denying her motion to reopen, and (2) denying her motion to reconsider its denial of her motion to reopen immigration proceedings.
We have reviewed the record and the Board’s orders and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying either Okello’s motion to reopen or her motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2006); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 , 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475 , 481 (4th Cir.2006). We therefore deny both petitions for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Okello, No. A75843-249 (B.I.A. Oct. 8, 2004 & Feb. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8600857. Public record. Not legal advice.