# Carrier Corp. v. United States

> United States Court of Claims · February 14, 1964 · 328 F.2d 328

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8593054

## Case

- **Full name:** CARRIER CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR ON MERGER TO AFFILIATED GAS EQUIPMENT, INC. v. United States
- **Court:** United States Court of Claims
- **Decided:** February 14, 1964
- **Citations:** 328 F.2d 328; 164 Ct. Cl. 666
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Laramore
- **Judges:** Davis, Dureee, Jones, Laramore, Whitaker
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8593054

## Opinion text

Laramore, Judge,
concurring:
I concur with the ma j ority’s conclusion that plaintiff should recover on the basis of the majority opinion. I also concur with the majority that a supplemental agreement resulted. However, I would prefer that plaintiff’s damages should be *684 measured under the clause of the contract which provides for a termination for the convenience of the Government. This is in accordance with my concurring opinion in the cases of John Reiner & Co. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 881 , 325 F. 2d 438 (1963), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 931 (1964), and Brown & Son Electric Co. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 465 , 325 F. 2d 446 (1963).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8593054. Public record. Not legal advice.