# Page v. United States

> United States Court of Claims · April 4, 1921 · 56 Ct. Cl. 176

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8585951

## Case

- **Full name:** HUBERT D. PAGE AND DAVID B. BRINTON, PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF PAGE & BRINTON v. United States
- **Court:** United States Court of Claims
- **Decided:** April 4, 1921
- **Citations:** 56 Ct. Cl. 176; 1921 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 151; 1921 WL 1241
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Downex
- **Judges:** Campbell, Downex, Graham, Hat
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8585951

## Opinion text

DowNex, Judge,
concurring:
The view of this case as presented by the findings and opinion does not in all respects accord with my conception of it, and I therefore withhold a general concurrence; but since the conclusions reached result in a substantial judgment for the plaintiffs in an amount to which, in my judgment, they are fully entitled I concur in the judgment.
I am authorized to say that Judge Booth concurs in this conclusion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8585951. Public record. Not legal advice.