# Jerome Brown, Sr. v. US District Courts

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 1, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/856878

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 1, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/856878

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2551

MR. JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-03485-ELH)

Submitted: March 21, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his civil case. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. U.S.

District Courts, No. 1:12-cv-03485-ELH (D. Md. filed Dec. 3,

2012; entered Dec. 7, 2012). We grant Brown leave to proceed in

forma pauperis but deny his motion to seal the case. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/856878. Public record. Not legal advice.