# Brown & Ketcham Iron Co. v. L. P. Hazen & Co.

> Hamilton Circuit Court · January 4, 1908 · 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 490

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8508857

## Case

- **Full name:** Brown & Ketcham Iron Co. v. L. P. Hazen & Co.
- **Court:** Hamilton Circuit Court
- **Decided:** January 4, 1908
- **Citations:** 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 490; 11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 48; 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 148
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Smith
- **Judges:** Oiffln, Smith, Swing
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8508857

## Opinion text

SMITH, J.
Upon the authority of Ward v. Ward, 10 Circ. Dec. 656 ( 20 R. 136 ), we are of the opinion that the affidavit for attachment filed herein was void. This being so, did the giving of a bond by the defendant below to discharge the attachment have the effect of submitting the defendant to the jurisdiction of the court? We think not. See Saxton v. Plymire, 2 Circ. Dec. 118 ( 3 R. 209 ). The court therefore erred in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error to discharge the attachment, and said judgment is reversed.
Swing and Oiffln, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8508857. Public record. Not legal advice.