# De Leon v. Holder

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 3, 2010 · 393 F. App'x 999

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8480677

## Case

- **Full name:** Angel DE LEON v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 3, 2010
- **Citations:** 393 F. App'x 999
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Agee, Davis, Duncan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8480677

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that an alien who is inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) (2006) is ineligible for adjustment of status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1255(1) (2006)

## Opinion text

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Angel De Leon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his application for adjustment of status. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: De Leon (B.I.A. Feb. 25, 2010); see Ramirez v. Holder, 609 F.3d 331, 335-37 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that an alien who is inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(9)(C)(i)(I) (2006) is ineligible for adjustment of status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (1) (2006)). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8480677. Public record. Not legal advice.
