# Brown v. Mathena

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 3, 2010 · 393 F. App'x 987

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8480670

## Case

- **Full name:** Clayton BROWN v. R.C. MATHENA, Warden Officer Mitchell Sergeant Shrieve
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 3, 2010
- **Citations:** 393 F. App'x 987
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Duncan, Hamilton, King
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8480670

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clayton Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Mathena, No. 7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu, 2010 WL 1965105 (WJD.Va. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *988 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8480670. Public record. Not legal advice.