# United States v. Randolph

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 27, 2010 · 380 F. App'x 314

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8479862

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Vernell Brown RANDOLPH
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 27, 2010
- **Citations:** 380 F. App'x 314
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Davis, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8479862

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vernell Brown Randolph appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her third motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm *315 for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randolph, No. 4:04-cr-00024-JBF-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. Jan. 6, 2010). We deny Randolph’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8479862. Public record. Not legal advice.