# Grant v. City of North Charleston Housing Authority

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 16, 2010 · 365 F. App'x 460

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8477539

## Case

- **Full name:** Doris S. GRANT, — v. CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON HOUSING AUTHORITY Board of Commissioners of The Housing Authority of The City of North Charleston, —
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 16, 2010
- **Citations:** 365 F. App'x 460
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Duncan, Michael, Motz
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8477539

## Opinion text

*461 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Doris S. Grant appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting the Appellees’ summary judgment motion in Grant’s employment discrimination case brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. City of North Charleston Hous. Auth., No. 2:06-cv-03242-CWH, 2008 WL 4372980 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8477539. Public record. Not legal advice.