# Amr v. Virginia State University

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 16, 2009 · 352 F. App'x 845

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8474754

## Case

- **Full name:** Salame M. AMR, Plaintiff—Appellant v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY Eddie N. Moore, Jr. Nasser Rashidi Larry C. Brown Keith M. Williamson, Defendants—Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 16, 2009
- **Citations:** 352 F. App'x 845
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hamilton, King, Shedd
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8474754

## Opinion text

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Salame M. Amr seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to supplement the record for the appeal to this court of his underlying civil case. Because our decision in that appeal has issued, Amr v. Virginia State Univ., 331 Fed.Appx. 194 (4th Cir.2009) (unpublished), this appeal is now moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth the principles of appellate mootness). Therefore, we dismiss Amr’s appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8474754. Public record. Not legal advice.