# Brown v. Patrick

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 23, 2009 · 352 F. App'x 818

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8474734

## Case

- **Full name:** Jevon Edward BROWN, Plaintiff—Appellant v. PATRICK, Virginia Department of Corrections Officer, C/O, employee for Unit 27 Mr. Ragsdale, Virginia Department of Transportation, Foreman, Crew Virginia Ms. Francher, Virginia Department of Corrections, Unit 27, Medical Care Assistant/Personnel R. Grammer, Virginia Department of Corrections, Unit 27, former inmate J.H. Snodgrass A. Harris
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 23, 2009
- **Citations:** 352 F. App'x 818
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** King, Michael, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8474734

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying what it construed to be a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s February 24, 2009 order dismissing Brown’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Patrick, 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D.Va. Apr. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument *819 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8474734. Public record. Not legal advice.