# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · July 23, 2009 · 338 F. App'x 697

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8469430

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Christopher Eastman BROWN
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 23, 2009
- **Citations:** 338 F. App'x 697
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Schroeder, Thomas, Wardlaw
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8469430

## Opinion text

MEMORANDUM **
Christopher Eastman Brown, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, see United States v. *698 Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.
Brown contends that his conviction for violating 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a) is invalid because the Attorney General has not promulgated any regulations to implement the statute. This contention lacks merit. See generally United States v. Kwan, 407 F.3d 1005, 1011 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8469430. Public record. Not legal advice.