# Wells v. Bae Systems Norfolk Ship Repair

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 14, 2009 · 331 F. App'x 222

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8466005

## Case

- **Full name:** Carolyn WELLS v. BAE SYSTEMS NORFOLK SHIP REPAIR Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 14, 2009
- **Citations:** 331 F. App'x 222
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hamilton, Michael, Shedd
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8466005

## Opinion text

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carolyn Wells seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s decision and order on modification remand, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is in accordance with the law. See Consolidation Coal Co. v. Held, 314 F.3d 184, 186 (4th Cir.2002); Lane v. Union Carbide Corp., 105 F.3d 166, 170 (4th Cir.1997). Accordingly, although we grant Wells’ application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Wells’ petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8466005. Public record. Not legal advice.