# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 30, 2009 · 329 F. App'x 475

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8465190

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, — v. Waynely BROWN, Defendant—
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 30, 2009
- **Citations:** 329 F. App'x 475
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Agee, Hamilton, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8465190

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Waynely Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006). Brown asserts on appeal that the district court erred in declining to sentence him below the amended Guidelines range for crack cocaine offenses, contending that a lower sentence would be permitted by Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 , 128 S.Ct. 558 , 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). However, this argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 2401 , 173 L.Ed.2d 1296 (2009). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8465190. Public record. Not legal advice.