# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 22, 2009 · 326 F. App'x 704

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8463451

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. Michael BROWN, a/k/a Rasheem Russell, a/k/a Hakeem Brown, a/k/a Rasheem Jamal Russell, a/k/a Michael Haseem Brown, Defendant—Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 22, 2009
- **Citations:** 326 F. App'x 704
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Duncan, Gregory, Niemeyer
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8463451

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 1:01-cr-00023-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 14, 2008 & entered July 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8463451. Public record. Not legal advice.