# Odom v. Ozmint

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 28, 2009 · 325 F. App'x 254

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8462773

## Case

- **Full name:** Christopher A. ODOM, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Jon OZMINT, Director Mary Brown, Clerk Kerrie Specht, Parole Officer Ralph Hunter, Dho Mr. Steven, Case Worker Mrs. Laverette Mr. Hallman, Defendants—Appellees, and South Carolina Department of Corrections, Insurance Policy Holder
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 28, 2009
- **Citations:** 325 F. App'x 254
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8462773

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom *255 mendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Ozmint, No. 3:07-cv-00343-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8462773. Public record. Not legal advice.
