# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · March 27, 2014 · 559 F. App'x 938

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8458395

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Tishard Romell BROWN
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- **Decided:** March 27, 2014
- **Citations:** 559 F. App'x 938
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Fay, Martin, Pryor
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8458395

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Robert Nye, appointed counsel for Tish-ard Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Brown, arguing that there are no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could appeal either his conviction or his sentence. Nye filed a brief identifying arguable issues for appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Brown did not respond to Nye’s motion to withdraw or the Anders brief.
After a careful, independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could base an appeal. For this reason, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8458395. Public record. Not legal advice.
