# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 25, 2009 · 312 F. App'x 583

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8455667

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. James Edward BROWN, a/k/a JB
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 25, 2009
- **Citations:** 312 F. App'x 583
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Agee, Duncan, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8455667

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Brown appeals the district court order denying his motion to reconsider the order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and Brown’s contentions on appeal and find the district court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See *584 United States v. Brown, No. 8:97-cr00170-GRA-4 (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2008). We grant Brown’s motion to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8455667. Public record. Not legal advice.