# Fenner v. City of Durham/Board of Adjustment

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 29, 2013 · 535 F. App'x 314

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8454187

## Case

- **Full name:** Waldo FENNER v. CITY OF DURHAM/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 29, 2013
- **Citations:** 535 F. App'x 314
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Davis, Gregory, Thacker
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8454187

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER. CURIAM:
Waldo Fenner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Fenner’s 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 , 1985, 1986 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fenner v. City of Curham/Board of Adjustment, No. 1:10-cv-383-TDS-JLW, 2013 WL 1182240 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8454187. Public record. Not legal advice.