# Flores v. Mukasey

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 26, 2009 · 309 F. App'x 697

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8452898

## Case

- **Full name:** Maria Lourdes Barbara FLORES, a/k/a Maria Lourdes Barbara Fury v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent Maria Lourdes Barbara Flores, a/k/a Maria Lourdes Barbara Fury v. Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 26, 2009
- **Citations:** 309 F. App'x 697
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8452898

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Maria Lourdes Barbara Flores, a native and citizen of the Philippines, seeks review of orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motions to reopen. We have reviewed Flores’ arguments and find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s decisions denying her motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2008); Afanwi v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 788 (4th Cir.2008). To the extent Flores challenges the underlying decision of the Immigration Judge that was previously affirmed by the Board, those orders have already been reviewed by this court and are otherwise not part of the instant con *698 solidated petitions for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (d)(2) (2006); Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 , 115 S.Ct. 1537 , 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995).
Accordingly, we deny in part and dismiss in part the petitions for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8452898. Public record. Not legal advice.