# Kemph v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 5, 2013 · 522 F. App'x 203

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8452266

## Case

- **Full name:** William T. KEMPH v. W.F. BROWN, Detective Town of Vinton
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 5, 2013
- **Citations:** 522 F. App'x 203
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Diaz, Shedd, Thacker
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8452266

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Timothy Kemph appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice as legally frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, * see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(l), 1367(c) (2006), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kemph v. Brown, No. 7:12-cv-00430-GEC (W.D.Va. Nov. 8, 2012; Jan. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the *204 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We conclude that the order is final and appealable as no amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by the district court. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8452266. Public record. Not legal advice.