# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 17, 2013 · 518 F. App'x 553

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8451470

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Antwan Eugene BROWN, a.k.a. Antwon Eugene Brown
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 17, 2013
- **Citations:** 518 F. App'x 553
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Leavy, Murguia, Thomas
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8451470

## Opinion text

MEMORANDUM **
Antwan Eugene Brown appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 64-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Brown’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Brown the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8451470. Public record. Not legal advice.