# Mendes v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 13, 2012 · 465 F. App'x 232

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8447583

## Case

- **Full name:** Lynn Ellen MENDES v. Charles BROWN Charlotte Mecklenburg Public Library
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 13, 2012
- **Citations:** 465 F. App'x 232
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Agee, Floyd, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8447583

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lynn Ellen Mendes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8447583. Public record. Not legal advice.