# Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 13, 2012 · 464 F. App'x 131

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8443937

## Case

- **Full name:** Jonathan BOLLS v. VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 13, 2012
- **Citations:** 464 F. App'x 131
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8443937

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint challenging the constitutionality of the Appellee’s rules governing release of a failed applicant’s essay examination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, 811 F.Supp.2d 1260 (E.D.Va.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8443937. Public record. Not legal advice.
