# Chestnut v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 6, 2011 · 421 F. App'x 304

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8438746

## Case

- **Full name:** Craig Latwain CHESTNUT v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Turbeville Correction Institution Charles Brown, SCDC Employee Officer
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 6, 2011
- **Citations:** 421 F. App'x 304
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Agee, Niemeyer, Shedd
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8438746

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Chestnut’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chestnut v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:10-cv-02050-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8438746. Public record. Not legal advice.