# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · August 30, 2005 · 143 F. App'x 259

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8435659

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Jerrod BROWN
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- **Decided:** August 30, 2005
- **Citations:** 143 F. App'x 259
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Barkett, Birch, Dubina
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8435659

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that appeal was equitably moot because of the appellant's "failure to seek a stay, the numerous transactions effectuated under that plan's provisions," and the fact that the plan had been substantially consummated

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Susan L. Brach, appointed counsel for Jerrod Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8435659. Public record. Not legal advice.