# Floyd v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 9, 2005 · 122 F. App'x 683

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8431696

## Case

- **Full name:** Elizabeth Marie Rushing FLOYD, Plaintiff—Appellant v. David A. BROWN, an individual Robert Potter, an individual Richard Voorhees, an individual Thomas Widman, an individual, Defendants—Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 9, 2005
- **Citations:** 122 F. App'x 683
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** King, Niemeyer, Williams
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8431696

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to vacate the court’s September 24, 2004, order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Floyd v. Brown, No. CA-03-554-MCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8431696. Public record. Not legal advice.