# Moore v. Fahey

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 10, 2005 · 118 F. App'x 775

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8430710

## Case

- **Full name:** Carroll Lee MOORE, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Helen F. FAHEY, parole board member David Harker, parole board member Carol Ann Sievers, parole board member, Defendants—Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 10, 2005
- **Citations:** 118 F. App'x 775
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Gregory, Hamilton, Shedd
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8430710

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Carroll Lee Moore appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Fahey, No. CA-03-562 (E.D. Va. July 9 and July 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8430710. Public record. Not legal advice.