# S.L. v. Prince William County School Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 17, 2004 · 100 F. App'x 908

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8425482

## Case

- **Full name:** S.L., by her mother, Cynthia Lee, Plaintiff—Appellant v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant—Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 17, 2004
- **Citations:** 100 F. App'x 908
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8425482

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
S.L., a minor, by her mother, Cynthia Lee, appeals the district court’s order entered on October 27, 2003, denying her motion to reconsider the court’s order denying her motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See S.L. v. Prince William County School Bd., No. CA-02-1216-A (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 24, 2003 & entered Oct. 27, 2003). We also deny S.L.’s motion to expedite; we grant S.L.’s motion to amend her docketing statement. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Because S.L.’s notice of appeal is not timely as to either the underlying judgment or her first motion to set aside the judgment, we consider the appeal only as it relates to the order entered October 27, 2003.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8425482. Public record. Not legal advice.