# Shiferaw v. Ashcroft

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 10, 2004 · 100 F. App'x 191

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8425323

## Case

- **Full name:** Enque SHIFERAW v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 10, 2004
- **Citations:** 100 F. App'x 191
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8425323

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Enque Shiferaw, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Shiferaw’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2003); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 , 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Shiferaw, No. A78343-175 (BIA Sept. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8425323. Public record. Not legal advice.