# Bennett v. Schroeder

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 27, 2004 · 99 F. App'x 707

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8425231

## Case

- **Full name:** Clifford Caleb BENNETT v. P/O SCHROEDER, Police Officer of the City of Cincinnati, P/O James Davis, Police Officer of the City of Cincinnati, P/O John Doe, Police Officer of the City of Cincinnati, and City of Cincinnati
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 27, 2004
- **Citations:** 99 F. App'x 707
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Ryan
- **Judges:** Rosen, Ryan
- **Cited by:** 21 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8425231

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that “at the summary judgment stage after the close of discovery, Plaintiff can no longer simply rely on the allegations in his complaint; rather, he must present affirmative evidence supporting his allegations in order to withstand summary judgment” (internal quotation…
- finding that officer was entitled to summary judgment when plaintiff’s interrogatory answers did not state that officer was the one who arrested him and when officer testified that he had no personal involvement in the plaintiff’s arrest

## Opinion text

RYAN, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I concur in the judgment in this case because I agree that Bennett failed to come forward with any substantive evidence to establish that either Schroeder or Davis personally participated in the alleged deprivation of the plaintiffs constitutional rights. I concur fully with my colleague’s disposition of Bennett’s claim against the City of Cincinnati.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8425231. Public record. Not legal advice.