# Crawford v. Turpin

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 20, 2004 · 96 F. App'x 921

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8424492

## Case

- **Full name:** Perry L. CRAWFORD v. James M. TURPIN Susan McNeely Mary Steins, and North Carolina Department Of Corrections The Utilization Review Board
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 20, 2004
- **Citations:** 96 F. App'x 921
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Duncan, Motz, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8424492

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Perry L. Crawford appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Turpin, No. CA-01-40-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8424492. Public record. Not legal advice.