# Muldrow v. Eagleton

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 22, 2003 · 83 F. App'x 542

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8420758

## Case

- **Full name:** Edward Leon MULDROW, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Willie EAGLETON, Warden Major Joyner, Defendants—Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 22, 2003
- **Citations:** 83 F. App'x 542
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8420758

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Edward Leon Muldrow appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment for the reasons stated by the district court. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in *543 denying the Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. Brown v. French, 147 F.3d 307, 310 (4th Cir.1998). See Muldrow v. Eagleton, No. CA-02-3294-22BC-3 (D.S.C. May 30, 2003; July 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8420758. Public record. Not legal advice.