# Ayalew v. Ashcroft

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 12, 2003 · 71 F. App'x 242

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8417416

## Case

- **Full name:** Misrak AYALEW v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 12, 2003
- **Citations:** 71 F. App'x 242
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Motz, Traxler, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8417416

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Misrak Ayalew, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order denying her motion to reconsider and reconsider en banc. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Ayalew’s motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2003); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 , 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Ayalew, No. A77881-300 (B.I.A. Sept. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8417416. Public record. Not legal advice.