# Perry v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · August 6, 2013 · 725 F.3d 1140

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8412526

## Case

- **Full name:** Kristin M. PERRY Sandra B. Stier Paul T. Katami Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health Patrick O'Connell, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda Dean C. Logan, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Hak-Shing William Tam, Intervenor-Defendant, and Dennis Hollingsworth Gail J. Knight Martin F. Gutierrez Mark A. Jansson Protectmarriage.Com-Yes On 8, a Project of California Renewal, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants Kristin M. Perry Sandra B. Stier Paul T. Katami Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health Patrick O'Connell, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda Dean C. Logan, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Hak-Shing William Tam, Intervenor-Defendant, and Dennis Hollingsworth Gail J. Knight Martin F. Gutierrez Mark A. Jansson Protectmarriage.Com-Yes On 8, a Project of California Renewal, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 6, 2013
- **Citations:** 725 F.3d 1140; 2013 WL 3991967
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hawkins, Reinhardt, Smith
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8412526

## Opinion text

ORDER
In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of June 26, 2013 as well as the resulting judgment, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8412526. Public record. Not legal advice.