# Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy

> Oregon Supreme Court · December 3, 1999

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/836391

## Case

- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 3, 1999
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/836391

## Opinion text

Filed: December 3, 1999
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
In the Matter of the Compensation
of Kenneth P. Bundy, Claimant.
FRED MEYER, INC.,
Respondent on Review,
v.
KENNETH P. BUNDY
Petitioner on Review,
and
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND
BUSINESS SERVICES,
Respondents.
(WCB 95-07510; CA A95905; SC S46365)
On Appeal from the Court of Appeals.*
Argued and submitted November 8, 1999.
Roger Ousey, of Bischoff, Strooband & Ousey, P.C., Medford, argued the cause and filed
the brief for petitioner on review Kenneth P. Bundy.
Craig A. Staples, Vancouver, Washington, argued the cause and filed the brief for
respondent on review.
Megan A. Flynn, of Pozzi Wilson Atchison, LLP, Portland, filed a brief for amicus curiae
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.
David L. Runner, Lead Appellate Counsel, Salem, filed a brief in the Court of Appeals
for amici curiae SAIF Corporation and Timber Products Company.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Leeson, and Riggs,
Justices.**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is dismissed as improvidently allowed.
*Judicial review from the Workers' Compensation Board.
159 Or App 44 , 978 P2d 385 (1999).
**Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/836391. Public record. Not legal advice.