# Tucker v. Board of Parole

> Oregon Supreme Court · January 27, 2000

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/836372

## Case

- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** January 27, 2000
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/836372

## Opinion text

FILED: JANUARY 27, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
TERRENCE LEE TUCKER,
Petitioner on Review,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND
POST-PRISON SUPERVISION,
Respondent on Review.
(CA A92606; SC S44326)
On review from the Court of Appeals.*
On petition for review filed June 27, 1997.
Daniel Q. O'Dell, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for review.
With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.
Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent
on review. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Salem, and
Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, and Durham,
Justices.**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is
vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to dismiss the
petition for judicial review. See Quintero v. Board of Parole , 329 Or 319 , 986 P2d 575
(1999).
*Judicial review from the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision.
148 Or App 273 , 939 P2d 172 (1997).
**Fadeley, J., retired January 31, 1998, and did not participate in this decision;
Graber, J., resigned March 31, 1998, and did not participate in this decision;
Kulongoski, Leeson, and Riggs, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision
of this case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/836372. Public record. Not legal advice.