# Goodwin v. Neff

> Ohio Supreme Court · April 4, 1962 · 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 270

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8356065

## Case

- **Full name:** In re Guardianship of Sachs: Goodwin v. Neff
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 4, 1962
- **Citations:** 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 270
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bell
- **Judges:** Bell, Eadcliee, Fourth, Herbert, Matthias, Place, Stead, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8356065

## Opinion text

Bell, J.,
concurring. The Probate Court has full and exclusive jurisdiction to direct and control the conduct of guardians and to settle their accounts. Section 2101.24, Eevised Code. The record here discloses that the guardians sought and received the approval of the Probate Court prior to the redemption of the bonds involved herein. In the absence of any showing to the contrary, it must be assumed that the Probate Court, in approving the redemption of the bonds, acted according to the responsibility imposed upon it by law and took the action it did because such action was in the best interest of the ward.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8356065. Public record. Not legal advice.