# Stouffer Corp. v. Board of Liquor Control

> Ohio Supreme Court · March 21, 1956 · 165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8354558

## Case

- **Full name:** The Stouffer Corp. v. Board of Liquor Control
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 21, 1956
- **Citations:** 165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Weygandt
- **Judges:** Bell, Hart, Matthias, Stewart, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8354558

## Opinion text

Weygandt, C. J.,
dissents on the ground that, although rules and regulations promulgated by the Board of Liquor Control under its statutory authority must be reasonable, the record does not disclose circumstances so changed as to render existing regulation 64 now invalid as a matter of law.
Hart, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8354558. Public record. Not legal advice.