# Brown v. Ney

> The Superior Court of New York City · May 5, 1890 · 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 1138

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8333785

## Case

- **Full name:** Samuel G. Brown, App'lt v. Emil Ney, Resp'ts
- **Court:** The Superior Court of New York City
- **Decided:** May 5, 1890
- **Citations:** 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 1138
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8333785

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
None of the exceptions taken by the plaintiff appear to he tenable. The issues were fully and fairly submitted to the jury under a charge to which no exception was taken, and no reason appears for a disturbance of the verdict.
_ The judgment and order should he affirmed, with costs, on the opinion delivered by the trial judge on denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8333785. Public record. Not legal advice.