# Davis v. Van Zandt

> U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · June 15, 1820 · 2 D.C. 208

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8315118

## Case

- **Full name:** Davis v. Van Zandt
- **Court:** U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
- **Decided:** June 15, 1820
- **Citations:** 2 D.C. 208
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8315118

## Opinion text

But
the CouRT
{nan. con.) said it was not necessary to prove that fact to take the note out of the statute of limitations. The action.is brought on the note, and not on the new promise.
(But see Wetzel v. Bussard, 11 Wheat. 309 ; Read v. Wilkin son, 2 Wash. C. C. Rep. 514 ; Lonsdale v. Brown, 3 Wash. C. C. Rep. 404 .)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8315118. Public record. Not legal advice.